Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] x86/tdx: Route safe halt execution via tdx_safe_halt()
From: Dave Hansen
Date: Tue Feb 11 2025 - 18:46:45 EST
On 2/11/25 00:32, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
>> If CONFIG_PARAVIRT_XXL is disabled, "sti;hlt" sequences can still get
>> executed from TDX VMs via paths like:
>> acpi_safe_halt() =>
>> raw_safe_halt() =>
>> arch_safe_halt() =>
>> native_safe_halt()
>> There is a long term plan to fix these paths by carving out
>> irq.safe_halt() outside paravirt framework.
> I don't think it is acceptable to keep !PARAVIRT_XXL (read no-Xen) config
> broken.
Oh, I thought it took PARAVIRT_XXL=y to even trigger this issue. Was I
just confused?