Re: [PATCH 1/4] firmware: arm_scmi: bus: Bypass setting fwnode for scmi cpufreq

[Peng Fan]

On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 05:13:21PM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>On Wed, Dec 25, 2024 at 04:20:44PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
>> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>
>> 
>> Two drivers scmi_cpufreq.c and scmi_perf_domain.c both use
>> SCMI_PROTCOL_PERF protocol, but with different name, so two scmi devices
>> will be created. But the fwnode->dev could only point to one device.
>> 
>> If scmi cpufreq device created earlier, the fwnode->dev will point to
>> the scmi cpufreq device. Then the fw_devlink will link performance
>> domain user device(consumer) to the scmi cpufreq device(supplier).
>> But actually the performance domain user device, such as GPU, should use
>> the scmi perf device as supplier. Also if 'cpufreq.off=1' in bootargs,
>> the GPU driver will defer probe always, because of the scmi cpufreq
>> device not ready.
>> 
>> Because for cpufreq, no need use fw_devlink. So bypass setting fwnode
>> for scmi cpufreq device.
>>
>
>Not 100% sure if above is correct. See:
>
>Commit 8410e7f3b31e ("cpufreq: scmi: Fix OPP addition failure with a dummy clock provider")
>
>Am I missing something ?

Could we update juno-scmi.dtsi to use ?

 &A53_0 {
-       clocks = <&scmi_dvfs 1>;
+       power-domains = <&scmi_perf x>;
+       power-domain-names = "perf";
 };

Even for scmi-cpufreq.c that needs fw_devlink because of the clocks entry in
juno-scmi.dtsi, there is no issue here.
Because the dummy clock provider will always be ready before opp with
your upper fix. So we could safetly ignore fw_devlink per my understanding.

Regards,
Peng

>
>-- 
>Regards,
>Sudeep