Re: [PATCH v5 00/18] zsmalloc/zram: there be preemption

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Wed Feb 12 2025 - 19:10:04 EST

Next message: Indu Bhagat: "Re: [PATCH 0/8] unwind, arm64: add sframe unwinder for kernel"
Previous message: James Houghton: "Re: [syzbot] [kvm?] WARNING in vmx_handle_exit (2)"
In reply to: Sergey Senozhatsky: "[PATCH v5 17/18] zram: do not leak page on writeback_store error path"
Next in thread: Sergey Senozhatsky: "Re: [PATCH v5 00/18] zsmalloc/zram: there be preemption"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 15:26:58 +0900 Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> First, zsmalloc is converted to use sleepable RW-"lock" (it's atomic_t
> in fact) for zspage migration protection.

This sentence is stale?

Next message: Indu Bhagat: "Re: [PATCH 0/8] unwind, arm64: add sframe unwinder for kernel"
Previous message: James Houghton: "Re: [syzbot] [kvm?] WARNING in vmx_handle_exit (2)"
In reply to: Sergey Senozhatsky: "[PATCH v5 17/18] zram: do not leak page on writeback_store error path"
Next in thread: Sergey Senozhatsky: "Re: [PATCH v5 00/18] zsmalloc/zram: there be preemption"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]