Re: [PATCH v2 05/17] KVM: x86: Assume timer IRQ was injected if APIC state is protected

[Chao Gao]

On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 10:58:16AM +0800, Binbin Wu wrote:
>From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
>If APIC state is protected, i.e. the vCPU is a TDX guest, assume a timer
>IRQ was injected when deciding whether or not to busy wait in the "timer
>advanced" path.  The "real" vIRR is not readable/writable, so trying to
>query for a pending timer IRQ will return garbage.
>
>Note, TDX can scour the PIR if it wants to be more precise and skip the
>"wait" call entirely.
>
>Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
>Signed-off-by: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>---
>TDX interrupts v2:
>- No change.
>
>TDX interrupts v1:
>- Renamed from "KVM: x86: Assume timer IRQ was injected if APIC state is proteced"
>  to "KVM: x86: Assume timer IRQ was injected if APIC state is protected", i.e.,
>  fix the typo 'proteced'.
>---
> arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
>index bbdede07d063..bab5c42f63b7 100644
>--- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
>+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
>@@ -1797,8 +1797,17 @@ static void apic_update_lvtt(struct kvm_lapic *apic)
> static bool lapic_timer_int_injected(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> 	struct kvm_lapic *apic = vcpu->arch.apic;
>-	u32 reg = kvm_lapic_get_reg(apic, APIC_LVTT);
>+	u32 reg;
> 
>+	/*
>+	 * Assume a timer IRQ was "injected" if the APIC is protected.  KVM's
>+	 * copy of the vIRR is bogus, it's the responsibility of the caller to
>+	 * precisely check whether or not a timer IRQ is pending.
>+	 */
>+	if (apic->guest_apic_protected)
>+		return true;
>+
>+	reg  = kvm_lapic_get_reg(apic, APIC_LVTT);

nit:	   ^^ remove one space here

> 	if (kvm_apic_hw_enabled(apic)) {
> 		int vec = reg & APIC_VECTOR_MASK;
> 		void *bitmap = apic->regs + APIC_ISR;
>-- 
>2.46.0
>