Re: [PATCH hyperv-next 0/2] x86/hyperv: VTL mode reboot fixes
From: Saurabh Singh Sengar
Date: Thu Feb 13 2025 - 05:52:50 EST
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 02:56:43PM -0800, Roman Kisel wrote:
>
>
> On 2/12/2025 9:54 AM, Saurabh Singh Sengar wrote:
> >On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 02:21:18AM +0000, Wei Liu wrote:
> [...]
> >>
> >>Saurabh please review these patches. Thanks.
> >
> >Hi Roman,
> Hi Saurabh,
>
> >
> >Thanks for the patch, few suggestions and queries:
> >
> >1. Please fix the kernel bot warning
> Will do!
>
> >2. Cc Stable tree is not enough, you need to mention the "Fixes" tag as well
> > for the commit upto where you want this patch to be backported.
> Understood, thanks!
>
> >3. In your 2/2 commit, you mention 'triple fault' is the only way to reboot in x86.
> > Is that accurate ? Do you mean to say OpenHCL/VTL here ?
> > If this behaviour is specific to OpenHCl and not VTLs in general, is there a way
> > we can make these changes only for OpenHCL.
> Right, I meant OpenHCL/VTL2, thank you very much! The changes are scoped
> to running in VTLs in general at the moment. I can add a check for the
> VTL == 2 if you'd like me to.
>
> For VTL1 (aka LVBS), maybe folks would like to do something else,
> do you happen to know? Maybe to report that to the VTL0 guest kernel
> although seems dubious: the higher VTL failed so the lights must be out
> for the lower VTLs? Or kexec?
I am not aware of LVBS plans, and as far as I consider OpenVMM the only current
user of this VTL code. I recommend keeping the code as simple as possible unless
there is a clear use case for additional complexity. It would be helpful to include
these details in a comment so that future users of this file can understand and
modify it as needed.
- Saurabh
>
> >
> >- Saurabh
> >
> >>
> >>I don't have a strong opinion on them.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> arch/x86/hyperv/hv_vtl.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>base-commit: 2e03358be78b65d28b66e17aca9e0c8700b0df78
> >>>--
> >>>2.34.1
> >>>
>
> --
> Thank you,
> Roman
>