Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: net: Add FSD EQoS device tree bindings
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Date: Thu Feb 13 2025 - 07:03:07 EST
On 13/02/2025 12:04, Swathi K S wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: 13 February 2025 13:24
>> To: Swathi K S <swathi.ks@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: krzk+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; andrew+netdev@xxxxxxx; davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
>> edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx; kuba@xxxxxxxxxx; pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx;
>> robh@xxxxxxxxxx; conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; richardcochran@xxxxxxxxx;
>> mcoquelin.stm32@xxxxxxxxx; alexandre.torgue@xxxxxxxxxxx;
>> rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
>> devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-stm32@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
>> linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: net: Add FSD EQoS device tree
>> bindings
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 10:16:23AM +0530, Swathi K S wrote:
>>> + clock-names:
>>> + minItems: 5
>>> + maxItems: 10
>>> + contains:
>>> + enum:
>>> + - ptp_ref
>>> + - master_bus
>>> + - slave_bus
>>> + - tx
>>> + - rx
>>> + - master2_bus
>>> + - slave2_bus
>>> + - eqos_rxclk_mux
>>> + - eqos_phyrxclk
>>> + - dout_peric_rgmii_clk
>>
>> This does not match the previous entry. It should be strictly ordered with
>> minItems: 5.
>
> Hi Krzysztof,
> Thanks for reviewing.
> In FSD SoC, we have 2 instances of ethernet in two blocks.
> One instance needs 5 clocks and the other needs 10 clocks.
I understand and I do not think this is contradictory to what I asked.
If it is, then why/how?
>
> I tried to understand this by looking at some other dt-binding files as given below, but looks like they follow similar approach
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/stm32-dwmac.yaml
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/rockchip-dwmac.yaml
>
> Could you please guide me on how to implement this?
> Also, please help me understand what is meant by 'strictly ordered'
Every other 99% of bindings. Just like your clocks property.
Best regards,
Krzysztof