Re: [PATCH 6.12 000/422] 6.12.14-rc1 review

[Naresh Kamboju]

On Fri, 14 Feb 2025 at 14:16, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 at 20:02, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.14 release.
> > There are 422 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Sat, 15 Feb 2025 14:23:11 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.14-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> Regressions on the arm64, powerpc builds failed with gcc-8/13 and clang
> on the Linux stable-rc 6.12.14-rc1.
>
> Build regression: arm, powerpc, fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c too few arguments
>
> Good: v6.12.13
> Bad:  6.12.14-rc1 (v6.12.13-423-gfb9a4bb2450b)

Anders bisected this to,
# first bad commit:
   [91717e464c5939f7d01ca64742f773a75b319981]
   xfs: don't lose solo dquot update transactions

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org