Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] net: phy: mediatek: add driver for built-in 2.5G ethernet PHY on MT7988
From: SkyLake Huang (黃啟澤)
Date: Fri Feb 14 2025 - 08:30:55 EST
On Sun, 2025-01-19 at 18:31 +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>
> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
> you have verified the sender or the content.
>
>
> > + np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "mediatek,2p5gphy-
> > fw");
> > + if (!np)
> > + return -ENOENT;
>
> The device tree binding need documenting.
>
> > + /* Write magic number to safely stall MCU */
> > + phy_write_mmd(phydev, MDIO_MMD_VEND1, 0x800e, 0x1100);
> > + phy_write_mmd(phydev, MDIO_MMD_VEND1, 0x800f, 0x00df);
>
> 0x1100 and 0x00df are magic numbers, bit 0x800e and 0x800f are
> not. Please add #defines.
>
>
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < MT7988_2P5GE_PMB_FW_SIZE - 1; i += 4)
> > + writel(*((uint32_t *)(fw->data + i)), pmb_addr + i);
> > + dev_info(dev, "Firmware date code: %x/%x/%x, version:
> > %x.%x\n",
> > + be16_to_cpu(*((__be16 *)(fw->data +
> > + MT7988_2P5GE_PMB_FW_SIZE -
> > 8))),
> > + *(fw->data + MT7988_2P5GE_PMB_FW_SIZE - 6),
> > + *(fw->data + MT7988_2P5GE_PMB_FW_SIZE - 5),
> > + *(fw->data + MT7988_2P5GE_PMB_FW_SIZE - 2),
> > + *(fw->data + MT7988_2P5GE_PMB_FW_SIZE - 1));
> > +
> > + writew(reg & ~MD32_EN, mcu_csr_base + MD32_EN_CFG);
> > + writew(reg | MD32_EN, mcu_csr_base + MD32_EN_CFG);
> > + phy_set_bits(phydev, MII_BMCR, BMCR_RESET);
> > + /* We need a delay here to stabilize initialization of MCU */
> > + usleep_range(7000, 8000);
> > + dev_info(dev, "Firmware loading/trigger ok.\n");
>
> We generally don't spam the log for "Happy Days" conditions. Please
> only log if firmware download fails.
>
Thanks. I'll fix all the above.
> > +static int mt798x_2p5ge_phy_get_features(struct phy_device
> > *phydev)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = genphy_c45_pma_read_abilities(phydev);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + /* This phy can't handle collision, and neither can (XFI)MAC
> > it's
> > + * connected to. Although it can do HDX handshake, it doesn't
> > support
> > + * CSMA/CD that HDX requires.
> > + */
> > + linkmode_clear_bit(ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_100baseT_Half_BIT,
> > + phydev->supported);
>
> So it can do 10BaseT_Half? What about 1000BaseT_Half?
>
> As you said somewhere, 10/100/1G are not in the C45 space. So does
> genphy_c45_pma_read_abilities() report these features?
>
> Andrew
Nope. It can neither do 10BaseT_Half nor 1000BaseT_Half. 10 & 1000
Base_Half bits are already cleared in firmware.
BRs,
Sky