Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: cadence: macb: Report standard stats

[Jakub Kicinski]

On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 00:14:35 +0100 Andrew Lunn wrote:
> Could we maybe have one central table which drivers share? I assume
> IETF defined these bands as part or RMON?

IIRC RMON standardizes these three:

        {    0,    64 },
        {   65,   127 },
        {  128,   255 },
        {  256,   511 },
        {  512,  1023 },
        { 1024,  1518 },

Once we get into jumbo (as you probably noticed) the tables start 
to diverge, mostly because max MTU is different.

On one hand common code is nice, on the other I don't think defining
this table has ever been a source of confusion, and common table won't
buy users anything. But, would be yet another thing we have to check
in review, no?