Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: nv: Set ISTATUS for emulated timers, If timer expired

From: Marc Zyngier
Date: Sat Feb 15 2025 - 12:50:18 EST


On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 18:26:48 +0000,
Eric Auger <eauger@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Marc,
>
> On 2/7/25 7:38 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > On Fri, 07 Feb 2025 18:09:58 +0000,
> > Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hey,
> >>
> >> On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 05:45:33PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> >>> I found at least one issue that could fail the migration. Before the
> >>> VM starts running, we limit the feature set to the subset we actually
> >>> support with NV.
> >>>
> >>> By doing this, we also change the value of IDreg fields that are not
> >>> writable, because they describe features that we don't support.
> >>> Obviously, that fails on restore.
> >>>
> >>> I need to have a think...
> >>
> >> We spoke about this a while ago (and I forgot til now), but I was
> >> wondering if we could use vCPU feature flags to describe NV, including
> >> the selection between FEAT_E2H0 and FEAT_VHE.
> >>
> >> I think this might match userspace expectations a bit more closely where
> >> the state of the ID registers after init gives the actual feature set
> >> supported by the VM.
> >
> > I'm not sure that's enough. Let me give you an example:
> >
> > My host has FEAT_XNX, described in ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1.XNX. For whatever
> > reason, we don't allow this field to be written to, even out of NV
> > context. This is odd, because for an EL1 VM, this field means nothing
> > at all.
> So the curprit fields for me look like
>
> - ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1.XNX
> - ID_AA64DFR0_EL1.DoubleLock
> - ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.RAS
>
> This is still based on your nv-next branch from Jan 9
> https://github.com/eauger/linux/tree/nv_next_jan9_2025

I have now pushed out a new nv-next branch with the new and improved
UAPI. I expect migration to work a bit better, or at least not to
explode on ID register restore. You will notice that things have
changed a bit (extra flag and cap for FEAT_E2H0), but nothing really
major.

Thanks,

M.

--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.