Re: [PATCH v2 10/16] nvmem: microchip-otpc: Fix swapped 'sleep' and 'timeout' parameters

[Claudiu Beznea]

On 11.02.2025 08:52, Alexander Dahl wrote:
> Makes no sense to have a timeout shorter than the sleep time, it would
> run into timeout right after the first sleep already.
> While at it, use a more specific macro instead of the generic one, which
> does exactly the same, but needs less parameters.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Dahl <ada@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Fixes: 98830350d3fc ("nvmem: microchip-otpc: add support")

Fixes tag goes above you SoB tag.

> ---
> 
> Notes:
>     v2:
>     - Add Fixes tag
> 
>  drivers/nvmem/microchip-otpc.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/microchip-otpc.c b/drivers/nvmem/microchip-otpc.c
> index e2851c63cc0b4..bf7e5167152cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvmem/microchip-otpc.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/microchip-otpc.c
> @@ -85,8 +85,8 @@ static int mchp_otpc_prepare_read(struct mchp_otpc *otpc,
>  	writel_relaxed(MCHP_OTPC_CR_READ, otpc->base + MCHP_OTPC_CR);
>  
>  	/* Wait for packet to be transferred into temporary buffers. */
> -	return read_poll_timeout(readl_relaxed, tmp, !(tmp & MCHP_OTPC_SR_READ),
> -				 10000, 2000, false, otpc->base + MCHP_OTPC_SR);
> +	return readl_relaxed_poll_timeout(otpc->base + MCHP_OTPC_SR, tmp,
> +					  !(tmp & MCHP_OTPC_SR_READ), 2000, 10000);
>  }
>  
>  /*