BC (following up Bit X, Fair Pay, Low Jitter etc)

[Ywe Cærlyn]

Men and Demons.

I have thought some about programming language.
I think some functions could be hardware accelerated, and more 
instructions could be used. for low jitter (more pr. clock and bandwith 
potential).
(RISC is counterintuitive to high-level paradigms).
BC would be somewhere between B and C and suit this.
C++ simly seems vain, and I think it is academic to know the correct 
developments here, and be with it.

Such as for instance XFS, seems symbolcorrect, very little complaints on 
this, and should be used.

BC also is symbolcorrect for programming. Unix was indeed based on BCPL, 
which again is based on Bit, and binary logic.

Bit also is symbolcorrect for an optimal inner loop. (including context 
switches etc).
X is good for userinterface, and APIs.

Light.