On 2/17/25 13:26, Felix Fietkau wrote:Will do, thanks.
If multicast snooping is enabled, multicast packets may not always end up on
the local bridge interface, if the host is not a member of the multicast
group. Similar to how IFF_PROMISC allows all packets to be received locally,
let IFF_ALLMULTI allow all multicast packets to be received.
Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@xxxxxxxx>
---
net/bridge/br_input.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_input.c b/net/bridge/br_input.c
index 232133a0fd21..7fa2da6985b5 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_input.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_input.c
@@ -155,6 +155,8 @@ int br_handle_frame_finish(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb
pkt_type = BR_PKT_MULTICAST;
if (br_multicast_rcv(&brmctx, &pmctx, vlan, skb, vid))
goto drop;
+ if (br->dev->flags & IFF_ALLMULTI)
+ local_rcv = true;
}
}
This doesn't look like a bug fix, IMO it should be for net-next.
Also you might miss a mcast stat increase, see the multicast code
below, the only case that this would cover is the missing "else"
branch of:
if ((mdst && mdst->host_joined) ||
br_multicast_is_router(brmctx, skb)) {
local_rcv = true;
DEV_STATS_INC(br->dev, multicast);
}
So I'd suggest to augment the condition and include this ALLMULTI check there,
maybe with a comment to mention that all other cases are covered by the current
code so people are not surprised.
By the way what is the motivation for supporting this flag? I mean you can
make the bridge mcast router and it will receive all mcast anyway.