Re: [PATCH net] net: pse-pd: pd692x0: Fix power limit retrieval

[Andrew Lunn]

On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 02:48:11PM +0100, Kory Maincent wrote:
> Fix incorrect data offset read in the pd692x0_pi_get_pw_limit callback.
> The issue was previously unnoticed as it was only used by the regulator
> API and not thoroughly tested, since the PSE is mainly controlled via
> ethtool.
> 
> The function became actively used by ethtool after commit 3e9dbfec4998
> ("net: pse-pd: Split ethtool_get_status into multiple callbacks"),
> which led to the discovery of this issue.
> 
> Fix it by using the correct data offset.
> 
> Fixes: a87e699c9d33 ("net: pse-pd: pd692x0: Enhance with new current limit and voltage read callbacks")
> Signed-off-by: Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/net/pse-pd/pd692x0.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/pse-pd/pd692x0.c b/drivers/net/pse-pd/pd692x0.c
> index fc9e23927b3b..7d60a714ca53 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/pse-pd/pd692x0.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/pse-pd/pd692x0.c
> @@ -1047,7 +1047,7 @@ static int pd692x0_pi_get_pw_limit(struct pse_controller_dev *pcdev,
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		return ret;
>  
> -	return pd692x0_pi_get_pw_from_table(buf.data[2], buf.data[3]);
> +	return pd692x0_pi_get_pw_from_table(buf.data[0], buf.data[1]);

Would the issue of been more obvious if some #defines were used,
rather than magic numbers?

	Andrew