RE: [PATCH v2 07/16] x86/mce: Define BSP-only init

[Zhuo, Qiuxu]

> From: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@xxxxxxx>
> [...]
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c
> b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c index 302a310d0630..a4ef4ff1a7ff 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c
> @@ -656,9 +656,6 @@ void mce_amd_feature_init(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
>  	u32 low = 0, high = 0, address = 0;
>  	int offset = -1;
> 
> -	mce_flags.overflow_recov =
> cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_OVERFLOW_RECOV);
> -	mce_flags.succor	 =
> cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_SUCCOR);
> -	mce_flags.smca		 =
> cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_SMCA);
>  	mce_flags.amd_threshold	 = 1;
> 
> [...]
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c
> [...]
> +/* Called only on the boot CPU. */
> +void cpu_mca_init(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) {
> +	u64 cap;
> +
> +	if (!mce_available(c))
> +		return;
> +
> +	mce_flags.overflow_recov =
> cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_OVERFLOW_RECOV);
> +	mce_flags.succor	 =
> cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_SUCCOR);
> +	mce_flags.smca		 =
> cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_SMCA);

1. Before this patch set, the above code was executed only if the following 
    condition was true. Do we still need this check?

    if (c->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD || c->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_HYGON) 
    {
          The above code.
     }

2. Can " mce_flags.amd_threshold  = 1;" also be moved here?

-Qiuxu