Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the bitmap tree

From: Catalin Marinas
Date: Tue Feb 18 2025 - 13:25:51 EST


On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 09:16:34AM -0500, Yury Norov wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 02:10:25PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > Hi Stephen,
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 12:49:34AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 11:35:02 +0100 Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > I'm currently testing a proper fix for that one.
> > > > Should I just send it over as a diff to apply or rather a proper 'fixes' patch?
> > >
> > > Maybe a proper 'fixes' patch, please, if easy - otherwise a diff is
> > > fine.
> >
> > I just talked to Beata off-list. I think she'll try to use the current
> > for_each_cpu_wrap() API and avoid conflicts with the cpumask_next_wrap()
> > API change.
>
> Hi,
>
> Yes, for_each() loops are always preferable over opencoded iterating.
> Please feel free to CC me in case I can help.

Beata is going to post the official fix but in the meantime, to avoid
breaking next, I'll add my temporary fix:

--------8<--------------------------------