On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 02:32:32PM +0800, Baolu Lu wrote:
On 2/14/25 15:06, Nicolin Chen wrote:That's troublesome, I think just leave it so Joerg can pick it up. We
On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 02:11:03PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:Yes, sure. I will rebase it in the next version to avoid the conflict.
The iopf enablement has been moved to the iommu drivers. It is unnecessaryThis is in conflict with my fault patches that Jason just took
for iommufd to handle iopf enablement. Remove the iopf enablement logic to
avoid duplication.
Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu<baolu.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c | 1 -
drivers/iommu/iommufd/fault.c | 111 ++++++------------------
drivers/iommu/iommufd/iommufd_private.h | 3 -
3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-)
a couple days ago:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgg/iommufd.git/log/?
h=for-next
I think it needs a rebase, perhaps on the branch mentioned here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20250213150836.GC3754072@xxxxxxxxxx/
can figure out what to do with the conflict later.