Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the vfs-brauner tree

[Bagas Sanjaya]

On 2/19/25 17:04, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 03:45:41PM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> > Separating the bullet list should suffice (plus s/recommend/recommended/
> > for consistency with the rest of docs):
> >
> > ---- >8 ----
> > diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/porting.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/porting.rst
> > index 3b6622fbd66be9..cfac50a7258db6 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/filesystems/porting.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/porting.rst
> > @@ -1166,10 +1166,11 @@ kern_path_locked() and user_path_locked() no longer return a negative
> >   dentry so this doesn't need to be checked.  If the name cannot be found,
> >   ERR_PTR(-ENOENT) is returned.
> >   
> > -** recommend**
> > +** recommended**
> >   
> >   lookup_one_qstr_excl() is changed to return errors in more cases, so
> > -these conditions don't require explicit checks.
> > +these conditions don't require explicit checks:
> > +
> >    - if LOOKUP_CREATE is NOT given, then the dentry won't be negative,
> >      ERR_PTR(-ENOENT) is returned instead
> >    - if LOOKUP_EXCL IS given, then the dentry won't be positive,
> >
> > Let me know if I should send the formal patch.
>
> No, I'll fix it in-tree and fold it.
> Thanks.

OK, thanks!

--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara