Re: [PATCH] net: phy: qt2025: Fix hardware revision check comment

From: Andrew Lunn
Date: Wed Feb 19 2025 - 08:08:07 EST


On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 10:02:00AM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 23:53:50 +0000
> Charalampos Mitrodimas <charmitro@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Correct the hardware revision check comment in the QT2025 driver. The
> > revision value was documented as 0x3b instead of the correct 0xb3,
> > which matches the actual comparison logic in the code.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Charalampos Mitrodimas <charmitro@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/phy/qt2025.rs | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/qt2025.rs b/drivers/net/phy/qt2025.rs
> > index 1ab065798175b4f54c5f2fd6c871ba2942c48bf1..7e754d5d71544c6d6b6a6d90416a5a130ba76108 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/phy/qt2025.rs
> > +++ b/drivers/net/phy/qt2025.rs
> > @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ impl Driver for PhyQT2025 {
> >
> > fn probe(dev: &mut phy::Device) -> Result<()> {
> > // Check the hardware revision code.
> > - // Only 0x3b works with this driver and firmware.
> > + // Only 0xb3 works with this driver and firmware.
> > let hw_rev = dev.read(C45::new(Mmd::PMAPMD, 0xd001))?;
> > if (hw_rev >> 8) != 0xb3 {
> > return Err(code::ENODEV);
>
> Oops,
>
> Reviewed-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Given that this patch is expected to be merged via netdev, you might
> need to resend with a proper subject:
>
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.13/source/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst

Please also include a Fixes: tag.

Andrew