On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 14:14:35 +0200 Tariq Toukan wrote:
On 18/02/2025 23:13, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 17:53:14 +0200 Tariq Toukan wrote:
Maybe it wasn't clear enough.
We prefer the original patch, and provided the Reviewed-by tag for it.
Can you explain what do you mean by "cleaner"?
I like the alternative much more.
Cleaner in the sense that it doesn't touch existing code in en_rx.c
(datapath), and has shorter dereferences for the inner umr_wqe fields, like:
umr_wqe->ctrl
vs.
umr_wqe->hdr.ctrl
IMO that's minor, not sufficient to justify struct_group_tagged()