Re: Rust kernel policy

From: Fiona Behrens
Date: Thu Feb 20 2025 - 06:57:31 EST


Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Wed, 2025-02-19 at 12:52 -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> On 2/19/25 12:46 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> > I do feel that new drivers written in Rust would help with the
>> > vulnerabilities that new drivers usually add to the kernel.
>>
>> For driver developers it is easier to learn C than to learn Rust. I'm
>> not sure that all driver developers, especially the "drive by"
>> developers, have the skills to learn Rust.
>
> IMHO, Rust is not that difficult to learn but it is difficult to
> run.
>
> One point of difficulty for me still is the QA part, not really the
> code. QuickStart discusses on how to install all the shenanigans
> with distribution package managers.
>
> The reality of actual kernel development is that you almost never
> compile/run host-to-host, rendering that part of the documentation
> in the battlefield next to useless.
>
> Instead it should have instructions for BuildRoot, Yocto and
> perhaps NixOS (via podman). It should really explain this instead
> of dnf/apt-get etc.

What do you mean with via podman for NixOS?

I do still have on my ToDo list to build and publish a better nix
development shell for kernel with rust enabled, and could also add a
section on how to build a NixOS iso in the same nix code.
But sadly time is a finite resource and so did not yet got to it.

Fiona

>
>>
>> Bart.
>>
>
> BR, Jarkko