Re: [PATCH] scripts/gdb/linux/symbols.py: address changes to module_sect_attrs

From: Antonio Quartulli
Date: Fri Feb 21 2025 - 15:36:27 EST


On 21/02/2025 17:52, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 21.02.25 14:03, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
When loading symbols from kernel modules we used to iterate
from 0 to module_sect_attrs::nsections, in order to
retrieve their name and address.

However module_sect_attrs::nsections has been removed from
the struct by a previous commit.

Re-arrange the iteration by accessing all items in
module_sect_attrs::grp::bin_attrs[] until NULL is found
(it's a NULL terminated array).

At the same time the symbol address cannot be extracted
from module_sect_attrs::attrs[]::address anymore because
it has also been deleted. Fetch it from
module_sect_attrs::grp::bin_attrs[]::private as described
in 4b2c11e4aaf7.

Fixes: d8959b947a8d ("module: sysfs: Drop member 'module_sect_attrs::nsections'")
Fixes: 4b2c11e4aaf7 ("module: sysfs: Drop member 'module_sect_attr::address'")
Cc: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
scripts/gdb/linux/symbols.py | 13 +++++++++----
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/scripts/gdb/linux/symbols.py b/scripts/gdb/linux/symbols.py
index f6c1b063775a..610a3dd3c7b4 100644
--- a/scripts/gdb/linux/symbols.py
+++ b/scripts/gdb/linux/symbols.py
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ import gdb
import os
import re
+from itertools import count
from linux import modules, utils, constants
@@ -95,10 +96,14 @@ lx-symbols command."""
except gdb.error:
return str(module_addr)
- attrs = sect_attrs['attrs']
- section_name_to_address = {
- attrs[n]['battr']['attr']['name'].string(): attrs[n]['address']
- for n in range(int(sect_attrs['nsections']))}
+ section_name_to_address = {}
+ for i in count():
+ # this is a NULL terminated array
+ if sect_attrs['grp']['bin_attrs'][i] == 0x0:
+ break
+
+ attr = sect_attrs['grp']['bin_attrs'][i].dereference()
+ section_name_to_address[attr['attr']['name']] = attr['private']

You dropped that .string() from the name - I don't remember the details
anymore but we have it all around when picking up strings from C
structures. Was there a particular reason to do that?

Ouch. That was not intentional and my test did not explode, therefore I assumed the code was correct.

I presume it may explode if 'name' is changed into something not a string. In this case .string() would throw an exception and block the execution.

I will send v2 shortly with .string().


textaddr = section_name_to_address.get(".text", module_addr)
args = []

Thanks for picking up this task so quickly!

Well, I needed gdb to break into ovpn.ko :-)

Cheers,

--
Antonio Quartulli

CEO and Co-Founder
Mandelbit Srl
https://www.mandelbit.com