Re: [PATCH bpf-next v8 4/4] selftests/bpf: Add libbpf_probe_bpf_kfunc API selftests

From: Tao Chen
Date: Fri Feb 21 2025 - 22:01:32 EST


在 2025/2/22 02:19, Eduard Zingerman 写道:
On Sat, 2025-02-22 at 00:33 +0800, Tao Chen wrote:

[...]

+static const struct {
+ const char *name;
+ int code;
+} program_types[] = {
+#define _T(n) { #n, BPF_PROG_TYPE_##n }
+ _T(KPROBE),
+ _T(XDP),
+ _T(SYSCALL),
+ _T(SCHED_CLS),
+ _T(SCHED_ACT),
+ _T(SK_SKB),
+ _T(SOCKET_FILTER),
+ _T(CGROUP_SKB),
+ _T(LWT_OUT),
+ _T(LWT_IN),
+ _T(LWT_XMIT),
+ _T(LWT_SEG6LOCAL),
+ _T(NETFILTER),
+ _T(CGROUP_SOCK_ADDR),
+ _T(SCHED_ACT)
+#undef _T
+};
+
+void test_libbpf_probe_kfuncs_many(void)
+{

Hi Tao,

Sorry, probably some miscommunication from my side.
I did not mean this test for inclusion, it was meant as a one time
manual inspection of libbpf_probe_bpf_kfunc results.
Just as a sanity check before series is merged.
As an automated test it does not provide much meaningful signal.


Ok, i will resend v8 without this case, and check all the prog types later with your program. Thanks.

+ int i, kfunc_id, ret, id;
+ const struct btf_type *t;
+ struct btf *btf = NULL;
+ const char *kfunc;
+ const char *tag;
+
+ btf = btf__parse("/sys/kernel/btf/vmlinux", NULL);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(btf, "btf_parse"))
+ return;
+ for (id = 0; id < btf__type_cnt(btf); ++id) {
+ t = btf__type_by_id(btf, id);
+ if (!t)
+ continue;
+ if (!btf_is_decl_tag(t))
+ continue;
+ tag = btf__name_by_offset(btf, t->name_off);
+ if (strcmp(tag, "bpf_kfunc") != 0)
+ continue;
+ kfunc_id = t->type;
+ t = btf__type_by_id(btf, kfunc_id);
+ if (!btf_is_func(t))
+ continue;
+ kfunc = btf__name_by_offset(btf, t->name_off);
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(program_types); ++i) {
+ ret = libbpf_probe_bpf_kfunc(program_types[i].code,
+ kfunc_id, -1, NULL);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ ASSERT_FAIL("kfunc:%s use prog type:%d",
+ kfunc, program_types[i].code);
+ goto cleanup;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+cleanup:
+ btf__free(btf);
+}




--
Best Regards
Tao Chen