Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] Support for autonomous selection in cppc_cpufreq

From: zhenglifeng (A)
Date: Sat Feb 22 2025 - 05:08:44 EST


On 2025/2/19 3:17, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 2:55 AM zhenglifeng (A) <zhenglifeng1@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On 2025/2/6 21:14, Lifeng Zheng wrote:
>>> Add sysfs interfaces for CPPC autonomous selection in the cppc_cpufreq
>>> driver.
>>>
>>> The patch series is organized in two parts:
>>>
>>> - patch 1-5 refactor out the general CPPC register get and set functions
>>> in cppc_acpi.c
>>>
>>> - patches 6-8 expose sysfs files for users to control CPPC autonomous
>>> selection when supported
>>>
>>> Changelog:
>>>
>>> v5:
>>>
>>> - add more explanation to the commit logs and comments
>>> - change REG_OPTIONAL from bin to hex
>>> - split patch 2 into 3 smaller patches
>>> - remove CPPC_REG_VAL_READ() and CPPC_REG_VAL_WRITE() macros
>>> - move the modification part in patch 5 into a separate patch
>>> - rename the sysfs file from "energy_perf" to
>>> energy_performance_preference_val
>>>
>>> v4:
>>>
>>> - add REG_OPTIONAL and IS_OPTIONAL_CPC_REG to judge if a cpc register is
>>> an optional one
>>> - check whether the register is optional before CPC_SUPPORTED check in
>>> cppc_get_reg_val() and cppc_set_reg_val()
>>> - check the register's type in cppc_set_reg_val()
>>> - add macros to generally implement registers getting and setting
>>> functions
>>> - move some logic codes from cppc_cpufreq.c to cppc_acpi.c
>>> - replace cppc_get_auto_sel_caps() by cppc_get_auto_sel()
>>>
>>> v3:
>>>
>>> - change cppc_get_reg() and cppc_set_reg() name to cppc_get_reg_val() and
>>> cppc_set_reg_val()
>>> - extract cppc_get_reg_val_in_pcc() and cppc_set_reg_val_in_pcc()
>>> - return the result of cpc_read() in cppc_get_reg_val()
>>> - add pr_debug() in cppc_get_reg_val_in_pcc() when pcc_ss_id < 0
>>> - rename 'cpunum' to 'cpu' in cppc_get_reg_val()
>>> - move some macros from drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c to
>>> include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h with a CPPC_XXX prefix
>>>
>>> v2:
>>>
>>> - fix some incorrect placeholder
>>> - change kstrtoul to kstrtobool in store_auto_select
>>>
>>> Lifeng Zheng (8):
>>> ACPI: CPPC: Add IS_OPTIONAL_CPC_REG macro to judge if a cpc_reg is
>>> optional
>>> ACPI: CPPC: Optimize cppc_get_perf()
>>> ACPI: CPPC: Rename cppc_get_perf() to cppc_get_reg_val()
>>> ACPI: CPPC: Add cppc_set_reg_val()
>>> ACPI: CPPC: Refactor register value get and set ABIs
>>> ACPI: CPPC: Modify cppc_get_auto_sel_caps() to cppc_get_auto_sel()
>>> ACPI: CPPC: Add three functions related to autonomous selection
>>> cpufreq: CPPC: Support for autonomous selection in cppc_cpufreq
>>>
>>> .../ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu | 54 ++++
>>> drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 303 +++++++++++-------
>>> drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 3 +-
>>> drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 109 +++++++
>>> include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h | 30 +-
>>> 5 files changed, 372 insertions(+), 127 deletions(-)
>>>
>>
>> Gentle ping.
>
> OK, so I'm wondering how this is related to the patch series at
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20250211103737.447704-1-sumitg@xxxxxxxxxx/

This series refactors some cppc_acpi ABIs and supports cppc autonomous
selection with sysfs files in cpufreq policy. Later, [1] proposed another
design with different user interfaces.We will discuss and reach a consensus
with regard to this.

However, as mentioned in [1], patch 1-7 in this series (the cppc_acpi part)
are not related to user interfaces, so can be reviewed and applied
separately. I can also send patch 1-7 as a new thread if preferred.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20250211103737.447704-1-sumitg@xxxxxxxxxx/

>
>> Attach discussions of previous versions:
>> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241114084816.1128647-1-zhenglifeng1@xxxxxxxxxx/
>> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241122062051.3658577-1-zhenglifeng1@xxxxxxxxxx/
>> v3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241216091603.1247644-1-zhenglifeng1@xxxxxxxxxx/
>> v4: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250113122104.3870673-1-zhenglifeng1@xxxxxxxxxx/
>>
>