Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: mfd: Document TI LM3533 MFD

[Jonathan Cameron]

On Sat, 22 Feb 2025 09:01:18 +0200
Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> пт, 21 лют. 2025 р. о 22:38 Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> пише:
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 03:26:59PM +0200, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:  
> > > Add bindings for the LM3533 - a complete power source for
> > > backlight, keypad, and indicator LEDs in smartphone handsets.
> > > The high-voltage inductive boost converter provides the
> > > power for two series LED strings display backlight and keypad
> > > functions.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,lm3533.yaml    | 231 ++++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 231 insertions(+)
> > >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,lm3533.yaml
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,lm3533.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,lm3533.yaml
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..83542f0c7bf7
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,lm3533.yaml
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,231 @@
> > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > > +%YAML 1.2
> > > +---
> > > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/mfd/ti,lm3533.yaml#
> > > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > > +
> > > +title: TI LM3533 Complete Lighting Power Solution
> > > +
> > > +description: |  
> >
> > Use '>' rather than '|' if only formatting is paragraphs.
> >  
> 
> yaml check did not complain, fine.

It can't tell whether you want it formatted exactly or if paragraphs
is enough. 

> 
> > > +  The LM3533 is a complete power source for backlight,
> > > +  keypad, and indicator LEDs in smartphone handsets. The
> > > +  high-voltage inductive boost converter provides the
> > > +  power for two series LED strings display backlight and
> > > +  keypad functions.  
> >
> > Wrap lines at 80
> >  
> 
> Checkpatch and yaml check do not complain, why? 80 char limit was removed, no?

Check was to prevent over 80 chars, here you are far too short.