Re: [PATCH] Fuse: Add backing file support for uring_cmd

[Moinak Bhattacharyya]

> Without CONFIG_FUSE_PASSTHROUGH, fuse/passthrough.c
> is compiled out, so the check cannot be moved into fuse_backing_*
> we'd need inline helpers that return -EOPNOTSUPP when
> CONFIG_FUSE_PASSTHROUGH is not defined.
> I don't mind, but I am not sure this is justified (yet).
Sent out a review for this. IMO even without multiple use sites, the 
static inline helper method seems cleaner to me. I'm ok if we don't want 
it, but I really do think it would make our lives easier.