Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: phy: sfp: Add single-byte SMBus SFP access

From: Marek Behún
Date: Mon Feb 24 2025 - 09:45:04 EST

Next message: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH] nvme: map uring_cmd data even if address is 0"
Previous message: David Hildenbrand: "Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm, cma: fix 32-bit warning"
In reply to: Andrew Lunn: "Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: phy: sfp: Add single-byte SMBus SFP access"
Next in thread: Russell King (Oracle): "Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: phy: sfp: Add single-byte SMBus SFP access"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 01:48:19PM +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:

...

> "Please note:
> This hardware is broken by design. There is nothing that the kernel or

Doesn't "broken by design" mean "broken intentionally" ?

Marek

Next message: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH] nvme: map uring_cmd data even if address is 0"
Previous message: David Hildenbrand: "Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm, cma: fix 32-bit warning"
In reply to: Andrew Lunn: "Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: phy: sfp: Add single-byte SMBus SFP access"
Next in thread: Russell King (Oracle): "Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: phy: sfp: Add single-byte SMBus SFP access"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]