[PATCH] mm/page_alloc: Warn on nr_reserved_highatomic underflow

From: Brendan Jackman
Date: Tue Feb 25 2025 - 13:52:12 EST


As documented in the comment this underflow should not happen. The
locking has indeed changed here since the comment was written, see the
migratetype hygiene patches[0]. However, those changes made the locking
_safer_, so the underflow _really_ shouldn't happen now. So upgrade
the comment to a warning.

[0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240320180429.678181-7-hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx/T/#m3da87e6cc3348a4640aa298137bc9f8f61b76c84

Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/page_alloc.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 5d8e274c8b1d500d263a17ef36fe190f60b88196..715a9cfe162090cca9eb819a34c64f9a1c6db29a 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -3095,6 +3095,7 @@ static bool unreserve_highatomic_pageblock(const struct alloc_context *ac,
if (!page)
continue;

+ size = max(pageblock_nr_pages, 1UL << order);
/*
* It should never happen but changes to
* locking could inadvertently allow a per-cpu
@@ -3102,8 +3103,8 @@ static bool unreserve_highatomic_pageblock(const struct alloc_context *ac,
* while unreserving so be safe and watch for
* underflows.
*/
- size = max(pageblock_nr_pages, 1UL << order);
- size = min(size, zone->nr_reserved_highatomic);
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(size > zone->nr_reserved_highatomic))
+ size = zone->nr_reserved_highatomic;
zone->nr_reserved_highatomic -= size;

/*

---
base-commit: 0c789105c9d6c65777c995f4935f2e119d5a31a5
change-id: 20250225-warn-underflow-7ab0069182e2

Best regards,
--
Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@xxxxxxxxxx>