On Tue, 2025-02-25 at 17:06 +0800, Yanteng Si wrote:
在 2/24/25 9:53 PM, Philipp Stanner 写道:Not forgotten, I just think that patches 2-4 are code improvements, not
loongson_dwmac_probe() contains a loop which doesn't have anIt seems that the fix-tag has been forgotten, next two patches as
effect,
because it tries to call pcim_iomap_regions() with the same
parameters
several times. The break statement at the loop's end furthermore
ensures
that the loop only runs once anyways.
Remove the surplus loop.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner <phasta@xxxxxxxxxx>
well.
bug fixes.
The issue in patch 1 would cause actual misbehavior (a useless debug
information print in case of a resource collision), whereas 2-4 are
just ugly code, but not actual bugs: the loop always just runs once;
and unmapping the PCI resources manually is valid, but obviously
unnecessary.
Agreed?