RE: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: regulator: add adi,adp5055-regulator
From: Torreno, Alexis Czezar
Date: Tue Feb 25 2025 - 21:25:32 EST
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2025 10:07 PM
> To: Torreno, Alexis Czezar <AlexisCzezar.Torreno@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@xxxxxxxxx>; Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>;
> Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Conor Dooley
> <conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: regulator: add adi,adp5055-regulator
>
> [External]
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 05:08:33PM +0800, Alexis Czezar Torreno wrote:
>
> > + adi,power-saving-mode:
> > + description:
> > + If present, enables power saving mode for
> > + individual channels.
> > + type: boolean
>
> We have standard mode operations, please implement those.
Will implement
>
> > + adi,output-discharge-function:
> > + description:
> > + If present, enable output discharge functionality
> > + for individual channels.
> > + type: boolean
>
> set_active_discharge()
Will implement
>
> > + adi,disable-delay-us:
> > + description:
> > + Configures the disable delay for each channel. Dependent on Tset.
> > + enum: [0, 5200, 10400, 15600, 20800, 26000, 31200, 36400]
> > + default: 0
> > +
> > + adi,enable-delay-us:
> > + description:
> > + Configures the disable delay for each channel. Dependent on Tset.
> > + enum: [0, 2600, 5200, 7800, 10400, 13000, 15600, 18200]
> > + default: 0
>
> This looks a lot like the driver should implemnt the enable_time() and/or
> set_ramp_delay() operations and use the constraints to configure this.
Based on what I understand I agree implementing the enable_time() core
function for this. However, shall I keep the code for the disable-delay-us?
I don't think I saw a disable_time() equivalent