Re: [PATCH v13 06/14] x86/mm: use broadcast TLB flushing for page reclaim TLB flushing

[Tom Lendacky]

On 2/26/25 11:46, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Wed, 2025-02-26 at 11:36 -0600, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>>
>> Right, but the ASID valid bit is not set, so the flushing may match
>> more
>> than just host/hypervisor TLB entries.
>>
> Good point, when using SVM these flushes could result
> in flushing more TLB entries than we really want.
> 
> On the flip side, when SVM is not initialized, the
> invlpgb instruction will fail with a general protection
> fault if we have anything at all in the ASID field.
> 
> I don't know whether setting the ASID valid bit in
> rAX will cause a system to crash when SVM is not
> enabled or initialized.

As long as you keep the ASID value in EDX[15:0] as 0, then you won't
#GP. ASID 0 is the host/hypervisor. An ASID > 0 belongs to a guest.

Thanks,
Tom

>