Re: [PATCH v4 09/14] of: reserved-memory: Fix using wrong number of cells to get property 'alignment'

[Zijun Hu]

On 2025/2/27 05:30, Rob Herring wrote:
> Every time this code is touched, it breaks. This is not even the only
> breakage right now[1].
> 
>> 2) IMO, the spec may be right.
>>    The type of size is enough to express any alignment wanted.
>>    For several kernel allocators. type of 'alignment' should be the type
>>    of 'size', NOT the type of 'address'
> As I said previously, it can be argued either way.
> 
> Rob
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250226115044.zw44p5dxlhy5eoni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

this issue may be a downstream issue as well.

based on comments. they expects the CMA area is within 4G range.

but the wrong alloc-ranges config make the range (0x42000000 +
0xc0000000) > 4G across 4G boundary.