Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] arm64: realm: Use aliased addresses for device DMA to shared buffers
From: Catalin Marinas
Date: Thu Feb 27 2025 - 11:18:07 EST
On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 02:41:50PM +0000, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> When a device performs DMA to a shared buffer using physical addresses,
> (without Stage1 translation), the device must use the "{I}PA address" with the
> top bit set in Realm. This is to make sure that a trusted device will be able
> to write to shared buffers as well as the protected buffers. Thus, a Realm must
> always program the full address including the "protection" bit, like AMD SME
> encryption bits.
>
> Enable this by providing arm64 specific dma_addr_{encrypted, canonical}
> helpers for Realms. Please note that the VMM needs to similarly make sure that
> the SMMU Stage2 in the Non-secure world is setup accordingly to map IPA at the
> unprotected alias.
>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@xxxxxxx>
In case this goes in via the DMA API tree:
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
(we could bikeshed on the names like unencrypted vs decrypted but I'm
not fussed about)