Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] Utilize cpu-type for CPU matching
From: Pawan Gupta
Date: Thu Feb 27 2025 - 12:52:06 EST
On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 01:40:55PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Pawan Gupta (9):
> > x86/cpu: Prepend 0x to the hex values in cpu_debug_show()
> > cpufreq: intel_pstate: Avoid SMP calls to get cpu-type
> > perf/x86/intel: Use cache cpu-type for hybrid PMU selection
> > x86/cpu: Remove get_this_hybrid_cpu_*()
> > x86/cpu: Name CPU matching macro more generically (and shorten)
> > x86/cpu: Add cpu_type to struct x86_cpu_id
> > x86/cpu: Update x86_match_cpu() to also use cpu-type
> > x86/bugs: Declutter vulnerable CPU list
> > x86/rfds: Exclude P-only parts from the RFDS affected list
>
> So it looks like this series, despite being complete, fell between the
> cracks during the usual end-of-year distractions.
>
> To get the ball rolling I have applied the first 4 patches to
> tip:x86/cpu - the cpufreq one needed a small conflict resolution, and I
> have adjusted the debug output of the first one to not break
> pre-existing vertical tabulation.
Thanks for picking this up.
> Mind double checking the result in tip:x86/cpu and submit the remaining
> 5 patches on top of it?
I had quick look, fixes and merge resolution LGTM. I will submit the
remaining 5 patches soonish.