Hi Catalin,
On 2/20/25 2:58 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 03:24:06PM -0800, Reinette Chatre wrote:resctrl_find_domain() is currently in a .c file (arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c)
On 2/7/25 10:17 AM, James Morse wrote:[...]
rdt_find_domain() finds a domain given a resource and a cache-id.
This is used by both the architecture code and the filesystem code.
After the filesystem code moves to live in /fs/, this helper will no
longer be visible.
Move it to the global header file. As its now globally visible, and
has only a handful of callers, swap the 'rdt' for 'resctrl'.
It's in a header now, to avoid the compiler complaining about unused--- a/include/linux/resctrl.hCould you please provide a motivation for why this needs to be inline now?
+++ b/include/linux/resctrl.h
@@ -372,6 +372,40 @@ static inline void resctrl_arch_rmid_read_context_check(void)
might_sleep();
}
+/**
+ * resctrl_find_domain() - Search for a domain id in a resource domain list.
+ * @h: The domain list to search.
+ * @id: The domain id to search for.
+ * @pos: A pointer to position in the list id should be inserted.
+ *
+ * Search the domain list to find the domain id. If the domain id is
+ * found, return the domain. NULL otherwise. If the domain id is not
+ * found (and NULL returned) then the first domain with id bigger than
+ * the input id can be returned to the caller via @pos.
+ */
+static inline struct rdt_domain_hdr *resctrl_find_domain(struct list_head *h,
+ int id,
+ struct list_head **pos)
static functions wherever this file is included. The alternative is a
prototype declaration and the actual implementation in a .c file.
with a prototype declaration (in arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h). This patch
switches resctrl_find_domain() to be inline without a motivation.
After a fresh reading of "The inline disease" in Documentation/process/coding-style.rst
I do see a few red flags related to making this function inline. The function is certainly
larger than the rule of thumb of "3 lines" and considering the number of call sites I do
not see how bloating the kernel is justified.
Thanks.(drive-by comment, I don't really understand this subsystem to make aThanks for taking a look. The idea is not unique to resctrl.
meaningful contribution)
Reinette