Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/mm: Remove unnecessary include in set_memory.h
From: Kevin Brodsky
Date: Fri Feb 28 2025 - 12:44:06 EST
On 28/02/2025 18:14, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On 27/02/2025 14:03, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> So I tried to pick up this patch belatedly, but there's more places
>>>> that mistakenly learned to rely on the stray <linux/mm.h> inclusion,
>>>> for example on x86 defconfig-ish kernels:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c:6:
>>>> ./arch/x86/include/asm/set_memory.h:40:57: error: unknown type name ‘pgprot_t’
>>>> 40 | int __set_memory_prot(unsigned long addr, int numpages, pgprot_t prot);
>>>> | ^~~~~~~~
>> This patch relies on patch 1 in this series, which removes
>> __set_memory_prot(). I seem to be able to build x86_64_defconfig
>> without issue with both patches applies on the latest mainline.
> Oh, the 1/2 patch was missing from my mailbox (my mbox's fault, not yours),
> and apparently the 'PATCH 2/2' tag wasn't a big enough of a clue for me
> that there's a dependent patch. ;-)
Ah that would explain it! Naughty mailbox eating patches :)
> Anyway, I re-tested it with both patches applied and it's all looking
> good now, and I have applied them to tip:x86/headers.
Great, thank you!
- Kevin