From: Roman Kisel <romank@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2025 3:31 PM
The log statement reports the packet status code as the hypercall
status code which causes confusion when debugging.
Fix the name of the datum being logged.
Signed-off-by: Roman Kisel <romank@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c b/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c
index a8614e54544e..d7ec79536d9a 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c
@@ -1183,7 +1183,7 @@ static void storvsc_on_io_completion(struct storvsc_device *stor_device,
STORVSC_LOGGING_WARN : STORVSC_LOGGING_ERROR;
storvsc_log_ratelimited(device, loglevel,
- "tag#%d cmd 0x%x status: scsi 0x%x srb 0x%x hv 0x%x\n",
+ "tag#%d cmd 0x%x status: scsi 0x%x srb 0x%x sts 0x%x\n",
scsi_cmd_to_rq(request->cmd)->tag,
stor_pkt->vm_srb.cdb[0],
vstor_packet->vm_srb.scsi_status,
FWIW, I added that last status value labelled "hv" in commit 08f76547f08d. And
to confirm the discussion on the other thread, it's not a hypercall status -- it's a
standard Windows NT status returned by the host-side VMBus or storvsp code.
The "hv" is shorthand for Hyper-V, not hypercall. Perhaps that status is
interpretable in a Windows guest, but it's not really interpretable in a Linux
guest. The hex value would be useful only in the context of a support case
where someone on the host side could be engaged to help with the
interpretation.
I have no strong opinions on the label. Changing it from "hv" to "sts" or
to "host" works for me.
Reviewed-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@xxxxxxxxxxx>