Re: [PATCH v4 00/15] drm/bridge: Various quality of life improvements

[Maxime Ripard]

On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 02:34:04PM +0100, Herve Codina wrote:
> Hi Maxime,
> 
> On Mon, 3 Mar 2025 14:11:05 +0100
> Maxime Ripard <mripard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 12:00:04PM +0100, Herve Codina wrote:
> > > Hi Maxime,
> > > 
> > > On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 17:43:48 +0100
> > > Maxime Ripard <mripard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >   
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > Here's a series of changes after to the KMS helpers and bridge API
> > > > following a bunch of reviews I did.
> > > > 
> > > > It's mostly centered across providing an easier time to deal with bridge
> > > > states, and a somewhat consistent with the other entities API.
> > > > 
> > > > It's build tested only, with arm64 allmodconfig.
> > > > 
> > > > Maxime
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---  
> > > 
> > > I Tried to test this series on my system but I've got a compilation issue.
> > >      depmod: ERROR: Cycle detected: drm -> drm_kms_helper -> drm
> > >      depmod: ERROR: Found 2 modules in dependency cycles!
> > > 
> > > CONFIG_DRM=m in my configuration.  
> > 
> > Could you share your configuration? it doesn't happen with allmodconfig.
> > 
> 
> Here is a defconfig that leads to the issue on my side:

I still can't reproduce it, sorry. Is this based on linux-next /
drm-misc-next, or a private branch?

Maxime

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature