Re: [PATCH 1/7 v5] sched/fair: Filter false overloaded_group case for EAS
From: K Prateek Nayak
Date: Mon Mar 03 2025 - 23:38:30 EST
Hello Vincent,
On 3/3/2025 2:35 AM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
With EAS, a group should be set overloaded if at least 1 CPU in the group
is overutilized but it can happen that a CPU is fully utilized by tasks
because of clamping the compute capacity of the CPU. In such case, the CPU
is not overutilized and as a result should not be set overloaded as well.
group_overloaded being a higher priority than group_misfit, such group can
be selected as the busiest group instead of a group with a mistfit task
and prevents load_balance to select the CPU with the misfit task to pull
the latter on a fitting CPU.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@xxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@xxxxxxx>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 12 +++++++++++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 857808da23d8..d3d1a2ba6b1a 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -9931,6 +9931,7 @@ struct sg_lb_stats {
unsigned int group_asym_packing; /* Tasks should be moved to preferred CPU */
unsigned int group_smt_balance; /* Task on busy SMT be moved */
unsigned long group_misfit_task_load; /* A CPU has a task too big for its capacity */
+ unsigned int group_overutilized; /* At least one CPU is overutilized in the group */
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
unsigned int nr_numa_running;
unsigned int nr_preferred_running;
@@ -10163,6 +10164,13 @@ group_has_capacity(unsigned int imbalance_pct, struct sg_lb_stats *sgs)
static inline bool
group_is_overloaded(unsigned int imbalance_pct, struct sg_lb_stats *sgs)
{
+ /*
+ * With EAS and uclamp, 1 CPU in the group must be overutilized to
+ * consider the group overloaded.
+ */
+ if (sched_energy_enabled() && !sgs->group_overutilized)
+ return false;
+
if (sgs->sum_nr_running <= sgs->group_weight)
return false;
@@ -10374,8 +10382,10 @@ static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env,
nr_running = rq->nr_running;
sgs->sum_nr_running += nr_running;
- if (cpu_overutilized(i))
+ if (cpu_overutilized(i)) {
*sg_overutilized = 1;
Since sgs->overutilized is tracking the overutilized status, can we get
avoid passing the "sg_overutilized" pointer to update_sg_lb_stats() and
just use the sg->overutilized in update_sd_lb_stats()?
Something like below:
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 857808da23d8..de4a7e19d383 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -10346,14 +10346,12 @@ sched_reduced_capacity(struct rq *rq, struct sched_domain *sd)
* @group: sched_group whose statistics are to be updated.
* @sgs: variable to hold the statistics for this group.
* @sg_overloaded: sched_group is overloaded
- * @sg_overutilized: sched_group is overutilized
*/
static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env,
struct sd_lb_stats *sds,
struct sched_group *group,
struct sg_lb_stats *sgs,
- bool *sg_overloaded,
- bool *sg_overutilized)
+ bool *sg_overloaded)
{
int i, nr_running, local_group, sd_flags = env->sd->flags;
bool balancing_at_rd = !env->sd->parent;
@@ -10375,7 +10373,7 @@ static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env,
sgs->sum_nr_running += nr_running;
if (cpu_overutilized(i))
- *sg_overutilized = 1;
+ sgs->group_overutilized = 1;
/*
* No need to call idle_cpu() if nr_running is not 0
@@ -11046,7 +11044,7 @@ static inline void update_sd_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env, struct sd_lb_stats *sd
update_group_capacity(env->sd, env->dst_cpu);
}
- update_sg_lb_stats(env, sds, sg, sgs, &sg_overloaded, &sg_overutilized);
+ update_sg_lb_stats(env, sds, sg, sgs, &sg_overloaded);
if (!local_group && update_sd_pick_busiest(env, sds, sg, sgs)) {
sds->busiest = sg;
@@ -11056,6 +11054,7 @@ static inline void update_sd_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env, struct sd_lb_stats *sd
/* Now, start updating sd_lb_stats */
sds->total_load += sgs->group_load;
sds->total_capacity += sgs->group_capacity;
+ sg_overutilized |= sgs->group_overutilized;
sum_util += sgs->group_util;
sg = sg->next;
--
Thanks and Regards,
Prateek
+ sgs->group_overutilized = 1;
+ }
/*
* No need to call idle_cpu() if nr_running is not 0