Re: [PATCH v5 19/19] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Drop actions in amd_pstate_epp_cpu_offline()

[Gautham R. Shenoy]

On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 01:49:34AM -0600, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@xxxxxxx>
> 
> When the CPU goes offline there is no need to change the CPPC request
> because the CPU will go into the deepest C-state it supports already.
> 
> Actually changing the CPPC request when it goes offline messes up the
> cached values and can lead to the wrong values being restored when
> it comes back.
> 
> Instead drop the actions and if the CPU comes back online let
> amd_pstate_epp_set_policy() restore it to expected values.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar <dhananjay.ugwekar@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> v5:
>  * Reword commit message
>  * Add tag
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 9 +--------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> index 24a1f9e129b61..4a364ae9b56a1 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> @@ -1580,14 +1580,7 @@ static int amd_pstate_epp_cpu_online(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>  
>  static int amd_pstate_epp_cpu_offline(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>  {
> -	struct amd_cpudata *cpudata = policy->driver_data;
> -	union perf_cached perf = READ_ONCE(cpudata->perf);
> -
> -	if (cpudata->suspended)
> -		return 0;
> -
> -	return amd_pstate_update_perf(policy, perf.lowest_perf, 0, perf.lowest_perf,
> -				      AMD_CPPC_EPP_BALANCE_POWERSAVE, false);
> +	return 0;

LGTM

Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@xxxxxxx>

-- 
Thanks and Regards
gautham.

>  }
>  
>  static int amd_pstate_epp_suspend(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> -- 
> 2.43.0
>