Re: [PATCH 0/4] Optimize __vmalloc_node_range_noprof function.

[Dev Jain]

On 03/03/25 9:39 pm, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 05:44:06PM +0800, Liu Ye wrote:
> > The use of variables real_size and real_align in function
> > __vmalloc_node_range_noprof is unreadable. Optimize it in four patches.
> >
> > Liu Ye (4):
> >    mm/vmalloc: Remove unnecessary size ALIGN in
> >      __vmalloc_node_range_noprof
> >    mm/vmalloc: Size should be used instead of real_size in
> >      __vmalloc_node_range_noprof
> >    mm/vmalloc: Remove the real_size variable to simplify the code in
> >      __vmalloc_node_range_noprof
> >    mm/vmalloc: Rename the variable real_align to original_align to
> >      prevent misunderstanding
> >
> >   mm/vmalloc.c | 20 ++++++++------------
> >   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
> Let me double check it. Quick question, this series does not
> introduce any functional change?

Yeah, the cover letter subject is misleading. IMHO it should be more 
like "Refactor" instead of "Optimize".
> --
> Uladzislau Rezki