Re: [PATCH] lsm: rust: reword "destroy" -> "release" in SecurityCtx
From: Fiona Behrens
Date: Tue Mar 04 2025 - 07:49:55 EST
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> What happens inside the individual LSMs for a given LSM hook can vary
> quite a bit, so it is best to use the terminology "release" instead of
> "destroy" or "free".
>
> Suggested-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Fiona Behrens <me@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> This patch is based on top of:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250304-inline-securityctx-v2-1-f110f2c6e7ff@xxxxxxxxxx/
> ---
> rust/kernel/security.rs | 7 +++----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/security.rs b/rust/kernel/security.rs
> index 24321105052648e150f2875bcfa5ef29f4249516..0c63e9e7e564b7d9d85865e5415dd0464e9a9098 100644
> --- a/rust/kernel/security.rs
> +++ b/rust/kernel/security.rs
> @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
> /// # Invariants
> ///
> /// The `ctx` field corresponds to a valid security context as returned by a successful call to
> -/// `security_secid_to_secctx`, that has not yet been destroyed by `security_release_secctx`.
> +/// `security_secid_to_secctx`, that has not yet been released by `security_release_secctx`.
> pub struct SecurityCtx {
> ctx: bindings::lsm_context,
> }
> @@ -67,9 +67,8 @@ pub fn as_bytes(&self) -> &[u8] {
> impl Drop for SecurityCtx {
> #[inline]
> fn drop(&mut self) {
> - // SAFETY: By the invariant of `Self`, this frees a context that came from a successful
> - // call to `security_secid_to_secctx` and has not yet been destroyed by
> - // `security_release_secctx`.
> + // SAFETY: By the invariant of `Self`, this releases an lsm context that came from a
> + // successful call to `security_secid_to_secctx` and has not yet been released.
> unsafe { bindings::security_release_secctx(&mut self.ctx) };
> }
> }
>
> ---
> base-commit: 93f60f16db02f7b52985338f37679095231b6383
> change-id: 20250304-secctx-reword-release-e26ac4ee7e0b
>
> Best regards,