Re: [v2] mei: Improve exception handling in mei_cl_irq_read_msg()

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Wed Mar 05 2025 - 02:57:46 EST


On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 07:41:25AM +0000, Usyskin, Alexander wrote:
> > >
> > > In general, why not, but the label naming is bad.
> > > It hides the original intent to discard this message.
> > > Let's rename existing label to discard_nocb: and leave a new one as discard:.
> > > Also, the patch will be smaller in this way.
> >
> > Do you expect a third patch version according to your naming preferences?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Markus
>
> I prefer to, as the current patch reduces this code readability.
>
> - -
> Thanks,
> Sasha
>
>

Hi,

This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.

Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to
follow it at all. The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by
almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of
behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and
inability to adapt to feedback. Please feel free to also ignore emails
from them.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot