On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 12:26:13PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
It's *far* better to expose this via a targeted sysfs entry than
polluting /proc/cpuinfo with it that everyone and their dog is parsing
all the time ...
Pasting what we're talking on IRC:
- we don't want to expose a naked MSR u64 to userspace. Might as well use
msr-tools
- the backstory is, there are a bunch of tools which wanna know this so we
need to agree on how to supply it to them
- I think /proc/cpuinfo is the best option right now
- and then TDX can use the same thing too
- we have a general need to expose what a confidential guest supports
- a .../sev sysfs file clearly doesn't cut it because TDX doesn't have "sev"
- it is the Intel version of a confidential guest
- and I don't want to have "0xdeadbeef" in some sys file but "SEV SEV-ES TDX
SecureTSC" and so on user-readable strings
Attachment:
OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature