Re: [PATCH v4 1/8] bits: fix typo 'unsigned __init128' -> 'unsigned __int128'
From: Yury Norov
Date: Wed Mar 05 2025 - 09:30:32 EST
Hi Vincent!
On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 10:00:13PM +0900, Vincent Mailhol via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> "int" was misspelled as "init" in GENMASK_U128() comments. Fix the typo.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks for respinning the series. I'll take this fix in bitmap-for-next, so
if you need v2, you'll not have to bear this thing too.
Thanks,
Yury
> ---
> include/linux/bits.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/bits.h b/include/linux/bits.h
> index 61a75d3f294bfa96267383b5e2fd2a5d4593fcee..14fd0ca9a6cd17339dd2f69e449558312a8a001b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bits.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bits.h
> @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@
> * Missing asm support
> *
> * __GENMASK_U128() depends on _BIT128() which would not work
> - * in the asm code, as it shifts an 'unsigned __init128' data
> + * in the asm code, as it shifts an 'unsigned __int128' data
> * type instead of direct representation of 128 bit constants
> * such as long and unsigned long. The fundamental problem is
> * that a 128 bit constant will get silently truncated by the
>
> --
> 2.45.3
>