Re: [PATCH v1 00/40] x86: Leaf 0x2 and leaf 0x4 refactorings

[Ahmed S. Darwish]

On Tue, 04 Mar 2025, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > I've applied these three to tip:x86/urgent. I added Cc: stable to all 3
> > commits, because while these are old bugs, the first one had Cc: stable
> > and if we do it for one it's justified for all of them AFAICS. Arguably
> > our cacheinfo output in procps was inaccurate at times, and possibly
> > these bugs were part of the problem.
> >
...
> >
> > I've applied patches 4 to 9 to tip:x86/cpu (with x86/urgent merged in
> > due to dependencies and to give a singular topical base branch in the
> > x86 tree), they look good and obvious. (I added the build fix to 05/40)
> >
> > I've left 10 to 40 for further review by others too.
>
> While going through the rest I also picked up these patches as easy
> preparatory commits in tip:x86/cpu, there was no reason to have them
> later in the series:
>
>   29517791c478 x86/cacheinfo: Remove the P4 trace leftovers for real
>   d61b5118f719 x86/cacheinfo: Remove unnecessary headers and reorder the rest
>   0d22030c49bf <linux/sizes.h>: Cover all possible x86 CPU cache sizes
>

ACK on all the notes.

Thanks a lot for the amazing turnaround time :)