Re: [PATCH v3] scripts: generate_rust_analyzer.py: add missing macros deps

[Miguel Ojeda]

On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 6:03 PM Tamir Duberstein <tamird@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The macros crate has depended on std and proc_macro since its
> introduction in commit 1fbde52bde73 ("rust: add `macros` crate"). These
> dependencies were omitted from commit 8c4555ccc55c ("scripts: add
> `generate_rust_analyzer.py`") resulting in missing go-to-definition and
> autocomplete, and false-positive warnings emitted from rust-analyzer
> such as:
>
>   [{
>         "resource": "/Users/tamird/src/linux/rust/macros/module.rs",
>         "owner": "_generated_diagnostic_collection_name_#1",
>         "code": {
>                 "value": "non_snake_case",
>                 "target": {
>                         "$mid": 1,
>                         "path": "/rustc/",
>                         "scheme": "https",
>                         "authority": "doc.rust-lang.org",
>                         "query": "search=non_snake_case"
>                 }
>         },
>         "severity": 4,
>         "message": "Variable `None` should have snake_case name, e.g. `none`",
>         "source": "rust-analyzer",
>         "startLineNumber": 123,
>         "startColumn": 17,
>         "endLineNumber": 123,
>         "endColumn": 21
>   }]
>
> Add the missing dependencies to improve the developer experience.
>
> Fixes: 8c4555ccc55c ("scripts: add `generate_rust_analyzer.py`")
> Reviewed-by: Fiona Behrens <me@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Suggested-by: Chayim Refael Friedman <chayimfr@xxxxxxxxx>

If this is a fix, then it should use Reported-by -- or the suggestion
was about the implementation?

Anyway, I can fix it on my side, but I am also supposed to add a link
to the report/suggestion -- do you have one?

Thanks!

(Tested-by's welcome, by the way!)

Cheers,
Miguel