Re: [PATCH 2/2] pid: Optional first-fit pid allocation

From: Michal Koutný
Date: Thu Mar 06 2025 - 04:10:00 EST


On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 09:59:13AM +0100, Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I strongly disagree with this approach. This is way worse then making
> pid_max per pid namespace.

Thanks for taking the look.

> I'm fine if you come up with something else that's purely based on
> cgroups somehow and is uniform across 64-bit and 32-bit. Allowing to
> change the pid allocation strategy just for 32-bit is not the solution
> and not mergable.

Here's a minimalist correction
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250305145849.55491-1-mkoutny@xxxxxxxx/


Michal

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature