Re: [PATCH] pid: Do not set pid_max in new pid namespaces

From: Michal Koutný
Date: Thu Mar 06 2025 - 04:24:35 EST


On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 10:11:27AM +0100, Alexander Mikhalitsyn <alexander@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This completely makes sense and I tend to agree.
> But we also need to
> ensure that the kselftest for pid_max is not broken with this change.

I built [1] and ran it with three passes. Assuming it didn't rely on the
copying.

> Let me play with this stuff a bit and I get back with "Tested-by" ;-)

I'd be happy for further validation.

Thanks,
Michal

[1] https://github.com/Werkov/linux/commit/019b884d5a005dd8a3e18f0865b276fc3d804d7e

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature