Re: [PATCH v11 3/7] dt-bindings: PCI: qcom: Use sdx55 reg description for ipq9574

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 06/03/2025 12:52, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 20/02/2025 10:42, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
>> All DT entries except "reg" is similar between ipq5332 and ipq9574. ipq9574
>> has 5 registers while ipq5332 has 6. MHI is the additional (i.e. sixth
>> entry). Since this matches with the sdx55's "reg" definition which allows
>> for 5 or 6 registers, combine ipq9574 with sdx55.
>>
>> This change is to prepare ipq9574 to be used as ipq5332's fallback
>> compatible.
>>
>> Acked-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Unreviewed.
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> v8: Add 'Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski'
>> ---
>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml
>> index 7235d6554cfb..4b4927178abc 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml
>> @@ -169,7 +169,6 @@ allOf:
>>              enum:
>>                - qcom,pcie-ipq6018
>>                - qcom,pcie-ipq8074-gen3
>> -              - qcom,pcie-ipq9574
> 
> Why you did not explain that you are going to affect users of DTS?
> 
> NAK

I did not connect the dots, but I pointed out that you break users and
your DTS is wrong:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/f7551daa-cce5-47b3-873f-21b9c5026ed2@xxxxxxxxxx/

so you should come back with questions to clarify what to do, not keep
pushing this incorrect patchset.

My bad, I should really have zero trust.

Best regards,
Krzysztof